The Newt announced today that he's in the race for the Republican nomination for 2012!
and the SOB couldn't even be honest in his release. Saying, "I have been humbled by all the encouragement you have given me to run."
Newt has not been humbled by anything. Ever.
He is a big, fat, lying multiple adulterer sack o' s**t.
If more evidence is needed, please check previous posts.
this will be interesting, tho, as he explains why he can't keep his pants on. Oh, I mean "couldn't keep his pants on." I'm sure thats all in the past.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Torture advocates: "In your face, LIBERALS..."
There was already a letter to the editor in today's Courier declaring that it was torture that got us bin Laden and generally proclaiming the value of torture and chastising liberals for being too week-kneed to endorse it.
All of this without any proof whatsoever that the information that set the wheels in motion came about because of torture. And actually, most, if not all sources say that the info was obtained from traditional, non-enhanced interrogation techniques.
I believe that it is safe to say that torture is generally believed to be immoral, illegal and ineffective. But it does seem to maintain a loyal fan base.
At the risk of sounding unamerican, I just can't believe how blood-thirsty we are.
Eagerly endorsing the intentional infliction of pain on our enemies and fist-pumpingly proud over the death of a very evil man.
Update: here's the story from the NYT:
http//www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/us/politics/04torture.html?hp
Here's a link to a very funny article from Salon by Alex Pareene:
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/03/osama_reactions_guide
All of this without any proof whatsoever that the information that set the wheels in motion came about because of torture. And actually, most, if not all sources say that the info was obtained from traditional, non-enhanced interrogation techniques.
I believe that it is safe to say that torture is generally believed to be immoral, illegal and ineffective. But it does seem to maintain a loyal fan base.
At the risk of sounding unamerican, I just can't believe how blood-thirsty we are.
Eagerly endorsing the intentional infliction of pain on our enemies and fist-pumpingly proud over the death of a very evil man.
Update: here's the story from the NYT:
http//www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/us/politics/04torture.html?hp
Here's a link to a very funny article from Salon by Alex Pareene:
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/03/osama_reactions_guide
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)